18 month old loves baby dolls Relevant Information

As a lawyer, what's the wildest evidence you've used in court?

at made the case different was the product at issue.
My client was a sculptor who worked in Hollywood on realistic models. He came to work for a company which produced full size silicone love dolls. The agreement was that he would receive a percentage of the profits from his improvement of the dolls and other “prod Realistic Sex Doll cts.”
My client had left and started his own silicone doll company which competed directly with the original company. The other company filed a cross-complaint alleging that my client had created his dolls while still working at the first company and had stolen proprietary information as to how they were made.
The evidence used in court included 8 of the female dolls, a flat back torso, various heads and a “real cock.”
Opposing counsel and I had to handle and ask questions about the various products. Although opposing counsel would only refer to the “real cock” as the “RC,” he did not seem to have a problem waving the 11″ silicone penis around during questioning.
During litigation, there were di

DIY Pocket Pussy

Here's a DIY option that's readily available.

1. Stack two sponges on top of each other with a latex glove in the middle, securing everything with rubber bands. This creates a homemade pocket pussy. Pull the open end of the glove around the sponges to form your 'entrance'.
2. Insert your new pocket pussy into a sock, and place it in the opening of a pair of boxers.
3. Fill the remaining space in the boxers with towels to mimic legs and buttocks. Add extra padding if desired.
4. Tie everything securely with a belt to keep it in place.
5. Get some lube, mount your toy, and give it a try.

Looking for something more?

The Unconventional Case: Legal Battles in the World of Silicone Love Dolls

What set this case apart was the unusual product at its core.

My client, a sculptor known for crafting lifelike models in Hollywood, found himself working for a company specializing in full-size silicone love dolls. The agreement was clear - he would earn a share of the profits for his enhancements to the dolls and other associated products.

However, a twist emerged when my client left to establish his own silicone doll company, entering direct competition with his former employer. The original company responded with a cross-complaint, accusing my client of creating his dolls while still under their employment and of illicitly acquiring proprietary manufacturing information.

The evidence presented in court was nothing short of extraordinary, featuring eight cheap sex doll, a flat-back torso, various doll heads, and what was discreetly referred to as the "RC" or "real cock." Throughout the legal proceedings, opposing counsel and I had to handle these items and question witnesses about them. Interestingly, while opposing counsel preferred euphemisms like "RC," he had no reservations about brandishing an 11" silicone penis during questioning.

As the litigation progressed, disputes arose regarding the production of documents and other evidence. To address these challenges, we were assigned to a "discovery judge" who informally guided us in determining the relevance of various materials.

In summary, this case not only featured an unconventional subject matter but also relied on out-of-the-ordinary evidence. It serves as a reminder that legal proceedings can take unexpected turns, demanding creative handling of evidence and testimony.