1979 love n touch doll Relevant Information
(60 People Likes) Women, do any of you remember having a PJ Sparkles doll? Did you love it?
Yes I had her, but she w 1979 love n touch doll s not a cuddle doll, the sparkles ended up all over you
(34 People Likes) How can I buy high quality silicon sex dolls in India? Can I get home delivery?
yes. i got one for myself. they will deliver anywhere in India. +91 9747 660 616
(19 People Likes) Regardless of the driving motive
al pleasure. Want to know how do sex dolls fell? These pleasure gods actually satisfy more than a human can. How? One may ask. Well, their immense flexibility and utter compliance make the difference and unlike human beings, a realistic sex doll doesn’t have restrictions which makes them a sure way of trying out extraordinary styles and bring out the best in you. Sex dolls have essentially restored hope in many individuals who initially had lost trust in human dating. These magical dolls come in many shapes and sizes to cater for the varying tastes and preferences in the market With the everyday hustle and bustle, all that one wants after a long day at work is a welcoming and cool atmosphere to come home to. Talk about a good warm shower, a nice meal and to cap it up, a person to give you that company and help you shed off the negative energy. In as much this sounds easy, trust me getting someone to hold you down, completely submit to only you and give you their all, is very rare. With the alarming increase in the number of breakups cases and unpleasant marriages, a realistic sex doll remains the only alternative to a lifelong union. The doll is utterly submissive and will never leave you unless you decide to. A realistic sex doll is ultimately the real definition of a perfect partner. How? One would ask. Well, look at it these way, a realistic sex doll is 100% tamable, you don’t have to worry about its whereabouts or likelihoods of lost love. The doll is always ready to welcome and give you an amazing time any other day, there are no variations in their mood, no hormonal imbalances, just an anytime-ready kind of partner. The doll is never pesky and is therapeutic for those who have gone through troubled unions. With their customizable feature, you can have your ideal realistic sex doll just like you want it. Even more amazing Is that the doll remains a virgin and untouched till you actually purchase it, in a world where virgins are hard to find. A realistic sex doll is also an amazing partner; aware of when to talk and when not to (very important). The latest modification of these pleasure gods has seen them endowed with voice capabilities already programmed to give certain responses to appropriate situations. This is actually very amazing considering the satisfaction that comes with being complemented after some magical sex for instance, or coming home to a sex doll that can actually ask about your day and cheer you up for tomorrow. With most marriages falling due to the inability of partners to share their thoughts and feelings either because of own responsibilities or being worn out from work, realistic sex dolls are the ideal remedy. So, why should you get yourself a realistic sex doll
(74 People Likes) Which is the best sex doll shop in Qui Nhơn?
asure on of the best sex toy in Qui Nhơn. you don’t need to worry about 1979 love n touch doll elivery and th Cheap Sex Dolls prices are within your bud
(96 People Likes) How do scientists explain the real life Annebelle doll?
company. It could have been bought completed or as a sewing kit. I am no a doll expert even by a long stretch of the imagination, but my guess is the pattern type for the Annabelle doll was either the 1963 McCall’s pattern #6941 or the 1970 McCall’s pattern #2531. I could not find information on whether she was hand sewn or machine made. No matter which, Annabelle is made of cotton fabric and stuffing, with plastic eyes and acrylic wool hair. Annabelle was reportedly given to the “demonologists” Ed and Lorraine Warren after 1970 (ergo my guesses as to which patterns Annabelle follows). It is not clear who gave them the doll - it is reportedly an unnamed 28yold nursing student who experienced weird things after the doll came into her possession. Or so the Warrens say. She allegedly had a session with a “spirit medium” during which it was discovered the doll was possessed by the spirit of Annabelle Higgins (despite the name, an unidentified person who may or may not have existed and had anything to do with the doll). Or so the Warrens say. After their “investigation”, however, the Warrens were able to determine that the doll was possessed by a demon who was hoping to jump onto a human host. Or so the Warrens say. They certainly took possession of the doll at some point and it is still displayed in their museum in Monroe, Connecticut. The doll continued to act u Sex Doll there. Or so the Warrens say. Apparently, a visitor to the museum did not take the instructions on handling Annabelle seriously, which caused his tragic death in a motor accident on the way home. Or so the Warrens say. Similarly, a Catholic priest protested that Annabelle was not more powerful than god, and threw her across the room. Subsequently, he also had a motor accident, albeit his was not fatal. Or so the Warrenes say. I think you are getting my drift. Almost everything supernatural that people believe about Annabelle relies exclusively on what the Warrens say. (The rest relies on what they saw in the Conjuring movies… let that sink in.) Meanwhile, none of what the Warrens say can be objectively demonstrated. So, as a scientist, here is what I wonder about Annabelle: To those who have a much more extensive knowledge about Raggedy Ann dolls - which pattern does the Annabelle doll follow? Can you tell if it was a mass produced or a hand-made doll? What does her pattern and make tell of her age? Does she actually come from the 1970s? And on a related note - When did the Warrens first start talking about Annabelle? I have not been able to trace her original mention in their canon of stories… A timeline would be helpful, and it would also show us to what degree their testimony changed (or did not change) over time. Inconsistent stories are, obviously, less trustworthy, while consistent ones merit further investigation. Who was the unnamed motorcyclist who died after breaching Annabelle’s “security”? When did this incident happen? Is it possible to trace down the man’s name or death certificate? This might seem unrelated, but why did the author of the text you linked to put up an unrelated picture of a car crashed into a motorcycle in their answer? How did this bolster their argument? Do we have any reason to believe that the image pertains to this particular accident? If yes, than that may help us with narrowing down the earliest possible time frame for the accident by figuring out the make and model of the car and motorcycle depicted. Obviously, a 1980 model can appear in 1990, but not in 1970. This might help us look for a car-motorcycle collision, who was involved, and whether any of them ever visited the Warren’s museum… (I subsequently managed to figure out that the car involved was probably an AMC Matador, made between 1971 and 1978, in two distinct series but I don’t know which series the car in the image is. Meanwhile, a reverse search of the image gives me a Getty’s image offer for a poster, and a bunch of websites putting this image up to illustrate Warren’s story, but not explicitly connecting it to the event or providing a year for it.) Who was the un-named priest who also got into an accident after mishandling Annabelle? What was his name? Which diocese was he part of? What reports did he write to his superiors about the event? Which sacred order was he inducted into? Is there any documentation to record his car wreck, the subsequent police report, his medical records, etc. (because there certainly should have been)? Is he still alive? If we can interview him, how consistent would his story of the incident be to the one told by the Warrens if the interviews are conducted independently? Does Annabelle have consistent negative effects on those who “mishandle” her? If so, we can test this hypothesis. I would volunteer, and I know a few more sceptics who would do it too, just to have a larger sample. You see, we have two supposed incidents in which a guy had an accident on his way back from the Warren’s museum after he touched Annabelle (or flipped her off, or whatever). But this, in and of itself, means nothing unless we know 1) how many other people had an accident on their way back from the Warren’s museum without having offended Annabelle, 2) how many other people offended Annabelle and lived to tell the tale, and 3) how many people on average have accidents in this part of Connecticut. Two people having accidents in twenty plus years of a small-town back-road museum is deeply unsurprising and statistically unremarkable. And even if we knew all that, the fact remains that it is entirely possible, even likely, to have an accident on the road. Why are these (supposed!!!) accidents conclusively connected to Annabelle? Did she leave a signature at the crime scene, as she apparently used to with the nursing student? Was she heard threatening the guy? What was the cause of his accident, and what part of that was Annabelle’s fault (because, remember, there are usually multiple factors to a fatal accident - so which one is Annabelle??)? How can you know that? How can anybody claim any causal relationship based on this flimsy, unsupported correlation? It is said that Annabelle resists being destroyed. Another testable claim, hooray! Again, I will volunteer to set fire to the Annabelle doll, on camera, streaming in real time, with independent judges. Let’s see if she burns! (This should probably be the final test…) It is also said that Annabelle moves in her box. Lovely, but does she really? If we have some indications that she does move, we should start asking how? We can move her to a new, absolutely stable compartment to eliminate the impact of her immediate environment, and see if she still moves for us there on camera. If she does, we can vary temperature or humidity in her compartment to see if that causes movements. We can xray her to see whether there are any unexpected materials which might cause the movement (e.g. wires). And my main question, how - and I mean HOW, by which method, through which process, following which criteria - did Lorraine Warren come up with the idea that no, Annabelle was not possessed by a human spirit, but by a demon? How???? What did she observe exactly and is any of it objective? I understand that Lorraine says she has a supernatural gift of connection to the occult - but that is just the point. Lorraine merely says so. So those are some of my immediate questions about Annabelle - or to be more precise - these are my questions about the legend of Annabelle. The doll itself does not confuse me at all. It is a Raggedy Ann doll, probably from the 1970s, given or purchased by Ed and Lorraine Warren and displayed in their museum with an accompanying creepy tale. Despite the tales, Annabelle is just a piece of cotton fabric and stuffing. I could demonstrate it to you if Lorraine Warren would be willing to let me try burning it on television or drive around with it in a
