all sex dolls Relevant Information
(30 People Likes) How can I track my girlfriend to see what she is doing when I am not with her?
d all of her emails and facebook private chats. You could try and pay off her best friend with exorbitant amounts of money so that she relates all conv all sex dolls rsations she has with her best friend…. …… Or you could just trust her. What a radical thought! I think the problem doesn’t lie with what your girlfriend is getting up to but more with your own feelings of insecurity about keeping her. She loves you. She is with you. Being jealous or controlling to the level you’re talking about is almost certainly going to force you apart. Would you like to have someone spying on your every move? Implying that every conversation you have with a female is a precursor to flirting or sex? Would you like to find out that your girlfriend had hacked your phone so she could read your texts? No? Then how do you think she will feel if she realises you have these control issues? Sorr
(21 People Likes) Why are fewer and fewer people buying inflatable sex dolls?
sooo easy to get hookups and willing fuck buddies through any dating or on social media platforms. Free and aplenty of choices … why bother to buy?! Look at some of this platform replies to some questions time after how many dates to have sex, people showing their pussies a Silicone Sex Doll d tits here generating likes or possible fuck buddies too! Sex is easy and free for guys as long as you willing to buy food or some gifts that may not even be expens
(62 People Likes) Why do some people think Meghan Markle was never pregnant and they used a surrogate?
eghan Markle could hardly get pregnant at age thirty-seven, after no other viable pregnancies after six weeks of trying. Based on her saying she was twelve weeks along at Princess Eugenie’s wedding, Meghan would have become pregnant six weeks after her wedding. That isn’t realistic. Meghan Markle supposedly had multiple abortions, making it more difficult for her to maintain a viable pregnancy at age thirty-seven. Remember, that a mother is considered old past the age of thirty-five. After three years, after age thirty-five, 75% will still be trying to get pregnant. Meghan’s odds were never in her favor. If Meghan was really born in 1977 and not 1981, and discrepancies do exist, then she stood basically a 2% chance of getting (not even staying) pregnant. Meghan would have been 40 with no known successful pregnancies, making it harder for her to stay pregnant. Throughout Meghan’s pregnancy, the size and shape of her bump changed drastically. Somedays it was a rectangle, as though it had been in a suitcase, and other times she would have a very large bump, only to have it shrink in size over the week. A truly pregnant woman’s belly does not ever shrink in size. It cannot do so. The baby grows every week and even a malnourished mother will have a larger bump in a week’s time. A pregnant belly will never shrink. Never. And Meghan’s did, many times. Meghan was filmed squatting down at eight months of pregnancy and her belly was deflated, and as she stood, and her belly re-inflated, an audible, Pop! was heard, and noticed by her visitors. It is on tape. Meghan squatted down, legs together, in high heels and rose again unassisted when she was eight months pregnant. That’s quite an accomplishment, and one most pregnant mothers could not have ever done. Just reading the observations of women who have been pregnant. Online. It’s all there for you to read. Meghan walked out with her belly around her knees one day. Not a belly on top, about a 7 months pregnant belly had fallen to her knees. Pregnant women do not have their uterus fall to their knees, ever. Meghan, at the NYC baby shower, had a huge baby bump, but not the night she went out with her flame, Markus Anderson. She had a flat stomach, but tried to hide it with a handbag. There could be no hiding her belly, it was simply too large at that point. But then it went flat. Meghan did not want to give any information on where she was giving birth. When the paparazzi were watching Frogmore Cottage for signs of activity in the weeks leading up to the delivery, no one was at Frogmore. No lights on, no activity, no cars. No Meghan. No Harry. Where were they? Meghan refused to use Queen Elizabeth’s OB/GYNs. Why? She said she didn’t want any “men in grey”, a Diana term, to attend her private birth. It was so private, no doctor would sign a birth certificate. There exists no record that Meghan gave birth to a baby in May 2019. As attested and affirmed by a physician. Harry and Meghan lied all sex dolls bout when Meghan went into labor, saying she went into labor after she reportedly gave birth. Why the timing issues? Fake? No birth happened? Making it as complicated as possible to confuse people? Meghan left the hospital FOUR hours after she gave birth for the first time in her life. No doctor would have released Meghan. It would have been unsafe for mother and baby. at that age. Meghan lied about when she left the hospital or lied about giving birth. Or so people claim. When Harry and Meghan brought “Archie” out to the three photographers and one videographer to see their new baby, the child never moved, as all newborns do, even when they sleep. The cameras could not get a good image of the baby. It is reported the couple used a doll. Dolls don’t move or make noises. And this baby didn’t move once or make any noise. Prince George on the steps of the Lindo Wing, and Archie’s closeup, below…. Prince Louis, newborn, below… When asked about the baby, Harry slipped and said “Archie” had changed so much in two weeks time. Meghan looked down at the gaffe, and never fully regained her composure. They left shortly after. So was there a real baby somewhere that had been born two weeks before Meghan’s presumed “birth”? Why the supposedly photoshopped images of Prince Phillip and Queen Elizabeth and Doria all gathered in a random hallway at Buck Palace (as if Doria would be wondering around on her own in there!)? Why not take real pics? Why use photoshop? Some allege that there was a surrogate who carried the egg of Meghan and the sperm of Harry to create this “Archie”. The surrogate lives in the UK and not North America. When the surrogate saw how mean Meghan was as a real person, the surrogate refused to give up her baby. In the UK the woman who carries the fetus is the mother and not the egg donor. Is this why the Queen refused to use the customary wording about a baby being born to a royal? Is this why no signatures confirmed a live birth involving Meghan? Is this why “Archie” is not a prince? He cannot ever be a prince if the child was born of a surrogate. That is not permitted. Ever. See the difference??? Cambridge baby, top. Sussex baby, bottom. Did the surrogate have a baby with Down’s Syndrome? That has been reported by others also, along with some photographic evidence. Can Meghan and Harry visit the baby? Does the surrogate live in the UK, as thought, and we see so few images of that baby because he is not Meghan’s child? Reportedly, Meghan and Harry used their friend’s baby when they went to Africa to show off “Archie” to the people there. When in Africa, the people had huge sings welcoming “Archie’s father” but nothing was up about Archie’s mother. Meghan reportedly tore down the banners in a rage, but she didn’t get rid of all the banners. They can be seen online on the public domain. Why? Why hide a surrogate pregnancy? This could have been the perfect time to shine a light on the benefits of having a surrogate mother carry a child for another woman. The front carrier was on upside down. Illustration purposes only…. In Canada, when Meghan was out with her two dogs, she had a baby doll hanging from her front carrier, which was worn incorrectly. Had Archie been in that carrier, he would have strangled to death according to experts. I’m only reporting on what I have read. These are not my opinions. They belong to many other people. Was Meghan using a doll and why not use the real baby? Was he not available? Archie has not been photographed since May, when Meghan taped a segment of her reading a book to the child, who had on a very soggy and drooping diaper, and he only wore a plain white onesie. Why? Why not dress up the child and change his diaper to a fresh and more comfortable one? I do have a grandson of almost the same age, and he likes dry diapers. If Meghan was maternal, it is alleged, she would have taken better care of said child and placed him a nice, clean outfit. And a fresh, dry diaper. It is alleged that Meghan and the baby had very little bonding together. “Archie” did not grab at Meghan’s face, or hold her hands, snuggle into her, play with her hair or her jewelry. There seemed to be no bond between this baby and Meghan. Again, just observations from many people. I am trying to include as many as is possible. “Archie” and his Christening photos are definitely photoshopped. Clearly. Anyone with an eye can see it. But why? Just baptize the child. The time stamp of the images are at eleven pm. As in almost midnight. The Christening photos were created at night. Why? Where are the real ones? Are there real ones? If the surrogate mum lives in the UK, it explains why “Archie” is not seen in any photos since the beginning of May 2020. That was five whole months ago. We would see their toddler if he lived in California, but since the child does not, there are no family photos of Harry, Meghan and “Archie”. It is said the name of the child is not even “Archie”. Meghan was mad at the Cambridges (again), and Prince George’s nickname was Archie. So she used the name “Archie”, strange as it was for a child, and in effect took away George’s pet name. Nice auntie, right? People have said Meghan enjoys playing mind games with people. This would be a mind game. It is also claimed that Meghan loves to lie. This would be a whopper of a lie. Where is “Archie”? And why hasn’t anyone spoken out about the strange child who is never seen? Some claim it will all come out in the trial of Markle v the Mail on Sunday. Will it? When will the royal family address Archie and any strangeness surrounding his birth, Meghan’s pregnancy and the subsequent lack of evidence that a child is living with Harry and Meghan in California? But they would have nothing to reveal if all is at it seems, right? When will Meghan and Harry take a family photo of the three of them all together? So, you see there exists quite an exhaustive list of reasons why people have their theories on “Archie” and Meghan and Harry. It’s exhausting to write them all down. But I cannot think of one more point of contention. This is not my opinion, as there exist many theories here. I wanted to make a list of all I have read, so readers on Quora can see what exists in the public domain regarding the child called, Archie. Now I’ll go back to giving my opinions o
(61 People Likes) Do you think that sex dolls are abnormal?
class="nturl" style="color: red">mini sex doll iving them to replace women with. But alas, it's just another object to gst your sexual driven needs out with no other benefit. To many who just want sex, it's a safer bet because it's no chance of babies or stds. For men and women who can't find a mate
(20 People Likes) What do you think about the couple who treats a Cabbage Patch doll as a real child while ignoring their own daughter?
usive, neglectful, short sighted, damaging , mentally unstable (insert more adjectives here).. Some people treat dogs and animals better than their children which is bad enough. One could report this to child protective services to see if it meets the standards of investigation and perhaps intervention. Even one visit from a social worker could make it better for the real daugh
