blowjob love doll Relevant Information
(69 People Likes) Why do some people think Meghan Markle was never pregnant and they used a surrogate?
eghan Markle could hardly get pregnant at age thirty-seven, after no other viable pregnancies after six weeks of trying. Based on her saying she was twelve weeks along at Princess Eugenie’s wedding, Meghan would have become pregnant six weeks after her wedding. That isn’t realistic. Meghan Markle supposedly had multiple abortions, making it more difficult for her to maintain a viable pregnancy at age thirty-seven. Remember, that a mother is considered old past the age of thirty-five. After three years, after age thirty-five, 75% will still be trying to get pregnant. Meghan’s odds were never in her favor. If Meghan was really born in 1977 and not 1981, and discrepancies do exist, then she stood basically a 2% chance of getting (not even staying) pregnant. Meghan would have been 40 with no known successful pregnancies, making it harder for her to stay pregnant. Throughout Meghan’s pregnancy, the size and shape of her bump changed drastically. Somedays it was a rectangle, as though it had been in a suitcase, and other times she would have a very large bump, only to have it shrink in size over the week. A truly pregnant woman’s belly does not ever shrink in size. It cannot do so. The baby grows every week and even a malnourished mother will have a larger bump in a week’s time. A pregnant belly will never shrink. Never. And Meghan’s did, many times. Meghan was filmed squatting down at eight months of pregnancy and her belly was deflated, and as she stood, and her belly re-inflated, an audible, Pop! was heard, and noticed by her visitors. It is on tape. Meghan squatted down, legs together, in high heels and rose again unassisted when she was eight months pregnant. That’s quite an accomplishment, and one most pregnant mothers could not have ever done. Just reading the observations of women who have been pregnant. Online. It’s all there for you to read. Meghan walked out with her belly around her knees one day. Not a belly on top, about a 7 months pregnant belly had fallen to her knees. Pregnant women do not have their uterus fall to their knees, ever. Meghan, at the NYC baby shower, had a huge baby bump, but not the night she went out with her flame, Markus Anderson. She had a flat stomach, but tried to hide it with a handbag. There could be no hiding her belly, it was simply too large at that point. But then it went flat. Meghan did not want to give any information on where she was giving birth. When the paparazzi were watching Frogmore Cottage for signs of activity in the weeks leading up to the delivery, no one was at Frogmore. No lights on, no activity, no cars. No Meghan. No Harry. Where were they? Meghan refused to use Queen Elizabeth’s OB/GYNs. Why? She said she didn’t want any “men in grey”, a Diana term, to attend her private birth. It was so private, no doctor would sign a birth certificate. There exists no record that Meghan gave birth to a baby in May 2019. As attested and affirmed by a physician. Harry and Meghan lied about when Meghan went into labor, saying she went into labor after she reportedly gave birth. Why the timing issues? Fake? No birth happened? Making it as complicated as possible to confuse people? Meghan left the hospital FOUR hours after she gave birth for the first time in her life. No doctor would have released Meghan. It would have been unsafe for mother and baby. at that age. Meghan lied about when she left the hospital or lied about giving birth. Or so people claim. When Harry and Meghan brought “Archie” out to the three photographers and one videographer to see their new baby, the child never moved, as all newborns do, even when they sleep. The cameras could not get a good image of the baby. It is reported the couple used a doll. Dolls don’t move or make noises. And this baby didn’t move once or make any noise. Prince George on the steps of the Lindo Wing, and Archie’s closeup, below…. Prince Louis, newborn, below… When asked about the baby, Harry slipped and said “Archie” had changed so much in two weeks time. Meghan looked down at the gaffe, and never fully regained her composure. They left shortly after. So was there a real baby somewhere that had been born two weeks before Meghan’s presumed “birth”? Why the supposedly photoshopped images of Prince Phillip and Queen Elizabeth and Doria all gathered in a random hallway at Buck Palace (as if Doria would be wondering around on her own in there!)? Why not take real pics? Why use photoshop? Some allege that there was a surrogate who carried the egg of Meghan and the sperm of Harry to create this “Archie”. The surrogate lives in the UK and not North America. When the surrogate saw how mean Meghan was as a real person, the surrogate refused to give up her baby. In the UK the woman who carries the fetus is the mother and not the egg donor. Is this why the Queen refused to use the customary wording about a baby being born to a royal? Is this why no signatures confirmed a live birth involving Meghan? Is this why “Archie” is not a prince? He cannot ever be a prince if the child was born of a surrogate. That is not permitted. Ever. See the difference??? Cambridge baby, top. Sussex baby, bottom. Did the surrogate have a baby with Down’s Syndrome? That has been reported by others also, along with some photographic evidence. Can Meghan and Harry visit the baby? Does the surrogate live in the UK, as thought, and we see so few images of that baby because he is not Meghan’s child? Reportedly, Meghan and Harry used their friend’s baby when they went to Africa to show off “Archie” to the people there. When in Africa, the people had huge sings welcoming “Archie’s father” but nothing was up about Archie’s mother. Meghan reportedly tore down the banners in a rage, but she didn’t get rid of all the banners. They can be seen online on the public domain. Why? Why hide a surrogate pregnancy? This could have been the perfect time to shine a light on the benefits of having a blowjob love doll surrogate mother carry a child for another woman. The front carrier was on upside down. Illustration purposes only…. In Canada, when Meghan was out with her two dogs, she had a baby doll hanging from her front carrier, which was worn incorrectly. Had Archie been in that carrier, he would have strangled to death according to experts. I’m only reporting on what I have read. These are not my opinions. They belong to many other people. Was Meghan using a doll and why not use the real baby? Was he not available? Archie has not been photographed since May, when Meghan taped a segment of her reading a book to the child, who had on a very soggy and drooping diaper, and he only wore a plain white onesie. Why? Why not dress up the child and change his diaper to a fresh and more comfortable one? I do have a grandson of almost the same age, and he likes dry diapers. If Meghan was maternal, it is alleged, she would have taken better care of said child and placed him a nice, clean outfit. And a fresh, dry diaper. It is alleged that Meghan and the baby had very little bonding together. “Archie” did not grab at Meghan’s face, or hold her hands, snuggle into her, play with her hair or her jewelry. There seemed to be no bond between this baby and Meghan. Again, just observations from many people. I am trying to include as many as is possible. “Archie” and his Christening photos are definitely photoshopped. Clearly. Anyone with an eye can see it. But why? Just baptize the child. The time stamp of the images are at eleven pm. As in almost midnight. The Christening photos were created at night. Why? Where are the real ones? Are there real ones? If the surrogate mum lives in the UK, it explains why “Archie” is not seen in any photos since the beginning of May 2020. That was five whole months ago. We would see their toddler if he lived in California, but since the child does not, there are no family photos of Harry, Meghan and “Archie”. It is said the name of the child is not even “Archie”. Meghan was mad at the Cambridges (again), and Prince George’s nickname was Archie. So she used the name “Archie”, strange as it was for a child, and in effect took away George’s pet name. Nice auntie, right? People have said Meghan enjoys playing mind games with people. This would be a mind game. It is also claimed that Meghan loves to lie. This would be a whopper of a lie. Where is “Archie”? And why hasn’t anyone spoken out about the strange child who is never seen? Some claim it will all come out in the trial of Markle v the Mail on Sunday. Will it? When will the royal family address Archie and any strangeness surrounding his birth, Meghan’s pregnancy and the subsequent lack of evidence that a child is living with Harry and Meghan in California? But they would have nothing to reveal if all is at it seems, right? When will Meghan and Harry take a family photo of the three of them all together? So, you see there exists quite an exhaustive list of reasons why people have their theories on “Archie” and Meghan and Harry. It’s exhausting to write them all down. But I cannot think of one more point of contention. This is not my opinion, as there exist many theories here. I wanted to make a list of all I have read, so readers on Quora can see what exists in the public domain regarding the child called, Archie. Now I’ll go back to giving my opinions o
![](https://www.elovedolls.com/imgaes_pc/product-imgs/6ye-doll//D06016/D06016-01.webp)
![](https://www.elovedolls.com/imgaes_pc/product-imgs/6ye-doll//D06117/D06117-01.jpg)
![](https://www.elovedolls.com/imgaes_pc/product-imgs/05/D05013/D05013-01.webp)
![](https://www.elovedolls.com/imgaes_pc/product-imgs/05/D05020/D05020-01.webp)
![](https://www.elovedolls.com/imgaes_pc/product-imgs/6ye-doll//D06084/D06084-01.webp)
![](https://www.elovedolls.com/imgaes_pc/product-imgs/6ye-doll//D06146/D06146-01.jpg)
![](https://www.elovedolls.com/imgaes_pc/product-imgs/6ye-doll//D06081/D06081-01.webp)
![](https://www.elovedolls.com/imgaes_pc/product-imgs/6ye-doll//D06163/D06163-01.webp)
(12 People Likes) What is perfectly legal, but creepy as hell?
sed her to have an aneurysm, I believe. They found evidence that he had sex with her during the autopsy. When he realized he found his underage teen stepdaughter dead, he had sex with her dead body while it was still warm and responsive to sexual contact. He confessed about having “always wanted to” and that she was dead, so why pass up the opportunity. Since she was dead, the courts agreed he had simply defiled a body, which required digging up an archaic law to fine him $50. In Tennessee, you can keep any roadkill you hit. Gerrymandering. It's perfectly legal to, in one of the most blatant and visible ways possible, to openly rig our voting system. White Supremacist Militant groups are not considered terrorists here and may operate unmolested unless a specific claim is made. The populace can all have guns, but even if every American citizen fought our military in a coup, the populace would be decimated and lose in under a week Marriage. It's legal to bind your finances to someone else and force them to be legally answerable for sexual choices. Yikes. Stand your ground laws. States with these mean that if anyone advances toward you and you think it is aggressive, it becomes legal to shoot them dead. On the USA, the first thing you have to do when starting a new job is sign paperwork that abdicates your right to sue them if they break the law to abuse you as an employee. The second thing is a mandatory urinalysis, but sometimes that comes first. For the big media reality shows (which are largely faked), if you go to audition, the fine print on the contract says that by attending an audition, whether you are actually seen or not, you sign away your rights to any music which you perform or compose in perpetuity. The contract actually addresses how this applies to the entire universe, just in case the
(63 People Likes) Can technology replace human interaction?
e humans are pretty adaptive to whatever intelligence they perceive around them. The isolated character in Cast Away replaces human interaction with a volleyball (Wilson) with a face painted on it. Some men in Japan have found satisfying relationships with anatomically correct inflatable dolls. And, as is documented already in other answers here, some people have formed bonds with well made chat bots. The latter point is important because there is growing evidence that computers do replace interaction for some people; most notably the old and the isolated, in much the same way pets do. That doesn’t make the computers “human” in any sense, but to the extent that a robot, whether in the form of a classic small robot, dog, or cat, can allow people to believe they have a companion, it’s a good thing. And if that interaction is with a progr
(32 People Likes) Why are silicone sex dolls preferred the most over others?
private space so only the usser can use .Another reason is they are expensive silicone sex dolls are not cheap so why would you leave them lying around for other people to look at or even use. Another reason is silicone sex dolls are a very personal thing that you can own, you may allso be embarrssed to say you own one so hide it for this reason. Their is an old saying in the adult sex toy business that millions of sex toys are sold every year but no one amits to owning one. Their are the exceptions of course like the man or women who will leave them in display in their car etc for the whole world to see. But most people like to be discreet as most adults would be. One of the first things people alw
(85 People Likes) How would you react if your spouse or significant other wants you to have cosmetic surgery to improve the way you look to others?
vy with a traditional hour glass. 32–31–39 - yah, big hippies! And naturally I had zero boobs but broad shoulders. Literally an A cup but there was major asymmetry with my breasts, one was an A cup, the other was half an A cup. Every single man I’d ever dated had expressed to me they wanted me to get a boob job. I never considered it prior to men telling me I needed it. Never, ever because I didn’t think it was that big of a deal. My mom has similar cup size had 3 kids. Is it that big a deal? Apparently yes. I wasn’t taking the hint truly, I didn’t realize how important breasts are for a man to find a woman attractive. Plus I was doing physical work small boobs were perfect. Fast forward I was dating my now husband who again, brought up my least favorite topic! My breast size. At this point in life though, I did notice my asymmetrical boobies were facing other problems. The once perky pointy breasts were now pointing downwards. And I was in my mid twenties! Disheartened, I still ignored it told my now husband to f*ck off get over it. But he pressed and said it was more about sexual satisfaction, and would make my body more proportioned etc. Let me say though, my husband is tolerant of many physical flaws. I have cellulite, no thigh gap, I get breakouts, have flabby arms plenty of stretch marks from youthful weight gain. He’s never complained about any of those issues. I am not a stick, although I really wish I were! At the time of this early request for breast enhancement, I was super fit, in the best shape of my life and thin at 135 lbs a size 4. I am now still a healthy BMI but have that annoying 10lbs i’d Like gone. My husband has also worked with tons of models in his career. He’s a designer understands symmetry of the body. So after finally getting engaged I relented since he was willing to pay. I figured if nothing else, it would help with wedding dress shopping because with my tiny boobs, clothes never once fit properly I always had to have the bust taken in. We found a surgeon despite tons of fear leading up to it, I went through with it. The immediate improvement to the appearance of my breasts post op completely blew me away. In retrospect, I think I wa Cheap Sex Dolls in complete denial about how severe my asymmetry had become frankly how unattractive my breasts were. I just thought of them as lumps of flesh and perceverated on my many other flaws. I had some nasty backlash from family for getting this done. An aunt I am very close to had some nasty words to say about it behind my back - she hasn’t seen my boobs nor knew my issues. On the contrary, my two best friends, who had seen me naked in locker rooms when we were athletes together in college told me how amazing I looked said they were shocked by the transformation and said I looked great, and completely natural. I’m so happy I went through with it. My body confidence has improved greatly. I disliked being the broad hipped girl with the broad shoulders and no boobs but figured it was my fate. i didn't Think a boob job would solve it. people don’t know I had implants because they look so natural and finally make my body proportional. The few new friends I’ve told Are stunned. The surprising response has been from men walking down the street - I never got hit on at bars or got much attention. Boy has that changed! I think that reaction made me more understanding to my husbands “want” for me to do this. Clearly men respond to breasts. You’d think i’d Realize that earlier on but not being well endowed by nature, I truly didn’t get how hard wired it is in men. Men are so different from women, but that’s for another day… Would I have preferred to marry a man who loved my body exactly as it was? Of course! But it never happened for me… and to be honest, I’ve yet to meet someone who is perfect in life. And if my husband’s biggest flaw is that he didn’t like my breasts, well he joined a club of other men who felt exactly the same. I didn’t hit the genetic lottery and I live in Southern California where each woman I pass is prettier and more perfect than the last. That said, my husband hasn’t asked me to get anything else done. He loves me, cares for me, provides me a wonderful life and is the only person I’ve ever known to love me unconditionally- he was willing to accept me not getting the surgery. He’s my partner in the best sense if altering my physique provides