cleaning a sex doll Relevant Information
(100 People Likes) Which Star Trek character(s) would you like to see removed from future movies/TV series and why?
ata again. Data was Anime Sex Doll he uneasy mixture of Pinocchio and the Tin Man in the WIZARD OF OZ .— neither of which I liked either. There was so much wasted time in TNG obsessing about Data’s sense of humor; Data’s “creativity;”. Data’s cat; Data’s recitals; blah, blah, blah. In a sense, he was supposed to be “Curious Child” except that NO ONE in the closed environment of a spacecraft would put up with Data’s intrusions and obsessional search for what it means to be “a real boy!” No one would have put up with all that from Westley Crusher. No one put up with ANYTHING from Westley Crusher. He was a child who worked hard and shut up about it— even when he had valid questions!! But NOT Data. The Data character went over the line when we reached “if he can do X, then why can’t he do Y?” Why can’t he have sex with Tasha cleaning a sex doll ar? Well, just ewwwwwwww. Essentially Tasha had herself a lifelike inflatable doll which was “fully functional.” Ew, ew, ew, ew!! The world is just full of things which, because we CAN do, doesn’t mean we should do. And if we do, we shouldn’t tell anyone we did!! Then Data procreates— first an odd life-LIKE creature which he morphs into a strange girl android with questionable fashion sense and her android head winsomely cocked to one side. But STARFLEET wants her— requiring Picard (the show’s STAR, let’s remember!!) to give an eloquent defense on the nature of family. An then she dies and she TNG writer wring great tears out of the audience. Data. Data. Data. Data. In large degree TNG slowly BECOMES “The Data Show.” And honestly at that point, I watched it less and less. So. My apologies to those who LOVED Data because I have been less than respectful of your guy. But I cannot tell a lie:
(95 People Likes) What do you think about the pilots' sightings of a human in a jetpack at 3,000 feet near LAX on 9/01/20? Is this a hoax or visual distortion?
(in Sydney) on runway 11L in a Piper Warrior when - out of the corner of my eye - I caught sight of ANOTHER plane - apparently on final too - but out to cleaning a sex doll Y left. Now my mind was racing - if I was planning on landing on runway 11 LEFT - and he was on final directly to MY left - I had no idea where he was going to be landing - other than perhaps the parallel taxiway - so I naturally freaked out. I called ATC and initiated an immediate “go round” and clearance to climb to circuit altitude of 1000′. They were initially confused b Sex Doll Torso t gave me the clearance. It was then that I explained the situation. It turned out to be a very large model plane - flying illegally near the GA airport. It looked real to me and f
(33 People Likes) I am 18 and have a job. Is it okay if I still like dolls? It feels childish, but I really like them.
you should see my doll collection. I’ve got some collector Barbies, and quite a lot of porcelains, many of which are costumed as characters from my books, but my favorites cleaning a sex doll re my Asian Ball-Jointed Dolls, many of which are also costumed as characters from my books. Try popping in here and joining us: Dollieh Sanctuary There are a LOT of us who are way older than you. Even a few mothers with teenage daughters who both love do
(81 People Likes) Are sex dolls that look like children illegal? Could they be used to control pedophiles’ desires in a safe way?
’m going to establish some facts and personal background before actually answering it. I am a victim of childhood abuse, both by confirmed pedophiles and abusers who abuse children. I’ve written about this extensively and some of the writing is in my profile. I am not a pedophile or anyone who has or would ever sexually abuse children. Pedophilia, or a sexual attraction to prepubescent children, is something that some people are, although estimates of exact percentages vary. It isn’t something someone chooses to be, it can’t be conditioned into them or out of them. It’s very likely, given what we know, that some people are simply born pedophiles and there is nothing to be done about that. Most sexual abuse of children is not perpetrated by pedophiles, but garden variety abusers who target children because children are easy victims. Now that we have that out of the way, let’s look at the goals here. The problem with our society presently when it comes to pedophiles is that we simply demonize anyone who is a pedophile. They make a great punching bag because anyone who is attracted to children is obviously a bad person, right? The fact that they can’t help their attraction is completely ignored and we lump people who are pedophiles but don’t actually act on it in any way (including in viewing child pornography) in with those that do. Because of that stigma around pedophiles, there isn’t a lot of solid research on it and what research there is heavily depends on offending pedophiles as subjects. Pedophiles who don’t offend rarely take part in studies because of the stigma around being a pedophile, so we have a limited sample size. As a society when it comes to dealing with pedophiles, the goal is and should be simply the reduction of harm to children. In other words, the goal should be whatever it takes so that less children are abused. If you look at it from that perspective, the answer when it comes to sex dolls that look like prepubescent children, is that if in the end it reduces harm to actual children, we should allow them. As for whether or not they actually reduce harm to children, we simply don’t have enough data to say one way or the other. Evidence seems to suggest that it does make a pedophile less likely to offend if they have access to some kind of way to relieve themselves sexually like with a doll. There isn’t any evidence to suggest any kind of escalation of activity like using a doll would make someone more likely to abuse children. Similar to how massive amounts of evidence shows that people who play violent video games are actually less likely to be violent in real life and as porn use goes up people are less likely to commit sexual assault, we can extrapolate that people are less likely to act on their urges with a real child if they have some kind of ethical outlet. The main way the pedophiles who do offend actually end up offending is by viewing and collecting child pornography. This hurts children and is wrong as well because you need to abuse real children to produce it. So having an outlet that doesn’t abuse children would make all of those pedophiles that fall into the trap of child pornography less likely to actually do that. This leads us to the logical conclusion as well, where if we could create child pornography without hurting children, would that be allowed as well? As animation gets better, this might someday be possible. These are thorny ethical issues that must be addressed. The thing is, personally it bothers me and disgusts me. The idea of someone using a sex doll that looks like a child and watching animated porn of people having sex with children Is repulsive (and personally triggering to me). However, we have to remember that we have a goal in mind here and that goal is: fewer children molested and harmed. So if something that bothers and disgusts us but doesn’t hurt any children will make it so that less actual children are harmed, I’m all for it. So in terms of whether or not they should be illegal I am leaning towards no. They should be allowed and we should do more scientific studies to make sure they actually do what we hope they do: make pedophiles less likely to offend. I would probably be in favor of them being prescribed by a psychiatrist or something like that, who would monitor the person using them and make sure they weren’t going to hurt a real child. However, this is outside of my wheelhouse. Do they encourage and normalize a cultural climate that condones child molestation and pedophila? Why or why not? It would in no way create something that condones child molestation. There is no slippery slope here. This has been brought up in countless other industries. Do movies and games that show violence condone real violence? All evidence points to no. In fact, healthy hum Real Doll ns are able to separate fantasy from reality and that’s why we are able to enjoy fantastical things that we would never condone in reality. There is strong evidence to suggest that having these fantasies prevents people from doing immoral things in real life. This is why rape fantasies are okay, but real rape isn’t. It goes on and on. As far as normalizing and condoning pedophilia, we need to normalize it in that we need to recognize that pedophilia or people who are pedophiles are normal and that they exist. We need to normalize their sexuality and help them not act on it. This is very important. Normalizing sexual abuse of children is not something we should ever do (and again, no evidence to suggest that child sex dolls do that). Normalizing pedophiles acknowledging their attractions and getting help to prevent them from hurting children is something we need to do. Summary: As someone who has been sexually abused as a child, I am willing to support anything that prevents another child from being sexually abused. If that means sanctioning and providing child s
(83 People Likes) What is the ethical implication of the trending sex dolls?
one, because they are way too primitive to be anything more th cleaning a sex doll n overpriced dildos or fleshlights. However, should we ever get to the point where they are even halfway convincing, I see them as positive: Women can no longer weaponize sex. For paedophiles etc. there's a harmless way of release, protecting children or possible rape victims.Sex Doll Torso > Less prostitut
