exotic and erotic love doll Relevant Information
(56 People Likes) Why is having a sex doll frowned upon?
urse. But I there are some negative associations with sex dolls that I do understand. First, it is easy to fit the narrative of a person who wants a real sex partner but can't get one. That would make the sex doll a sad surrogate, and we'd think: work on your real relationships! Then there is the illusion part. You are buying a product that is supposed to create an illusion, but it's so obviously fake! How can I take someone seriously who is able to believe in such crude deception! Third, like many other sex products, sex dolls often look particularly tasteless: not only obviously fake, but they don't even depict interesting looking people. They look as if some company has been trying to figure out the least common denominator of male tastes, and turned it into a product. Buying it can be seen as a sign of little self respect. Finally, some feminists take exception to the notion of men creating fake women to abuse as they please, as this would supposedly reinforce an evil way of thinking a exotic and erotic love doll out women that
(93 People Likes) Should people make sex dolls for people under 18 because they can't have sex, like a sex doll of a 15-year-old girl but only for 15 and under?
’m going to establish some facts and personal background before actually answering it. I am a victim of childhood abuse, both by confirmed pedophiles and abusers who abuse children. I’ve written about this extensively and some of the writing is in my profile. I am not a pedophile or anyone who has or would ever sexually abuse children. Pedophilia, or a sexual attraction to prepubescent children, is something that some people are, although estimates of exact percentages vary. It isn’t something someone chooses to be, it can’t be conditioned into them or out of them. It’s very likely, given what we know, that some people are simply born pedophiles and there is nothing to be done about that. Most sexual abuse of children is not perpetrated by pedophiles, but garden variety abusers who target children because children are easy victims. Now that we have that out of the way, let’s look at the goals here. The problem with our society presently when it comes to pedophiles is that we simply demonize anyone who is a pedophile. They make a great punching bag because anyone who is attracted to children is obviously a bad person, right? The fact that they can’t help their attraction is completely ignored and we lump people who are pedophiles but don’t actually act on it in any way (including in viewing child pornography) in with those that do. Because of that stigma around pedophiles, there isn’t a lot of solid research on it and what research there is heavily depends on offending pedophiles as subjects. Pedophiles who don’t offend rarely take part in studies because of the stigma around being a pedophile, so we have a limited sample size. As a society when it comes to dealing with pedophiles, the goal is and should be simply the reduction of harm to children. In other words, the goal should be whatever it takes so that less children are abused. If you look at it from that perspective, the answer when it comes to sex dolls that look like prepubescent children, is that if in the end it reduces harm to actual children, we should allow them. As for whether or not they actually reduce harm to children, we simply don’t have enough data to say one way or the other. Evidence seems to suggest that it does make a pedophile less likely to offend if they have access to some kind of way to relieve themselves sexually like with a doll. There isn’t any evidence to suggest any kind of escalation of activity like using a doll would make someone more likely to abuse children. Similar to how massive amounts of evidence shows that people who play violent video games are actually less likely to be violent in real life and as porn use goes up people are less likely to commit sexual assault, we can extrapolate that people are less likely to act on their urges with a real child if they have some kind of ethical outlet. The main way the pedophiles who do offend actually end up offending is by viewing and collecting child pornography. This hurts children and is wrong as well because you need to abuse real children to produce it. So having an outlet that doesn’t abuse children would make all of those pedophiles that fall into the trap of child pornography less likely to actually do that. This leads us to the logical conclusion as well, where if we could create child pornography without hurting children, would that be allowed as well? As animation gets better, this might someday be possible. These are thorny ethical issues that must be addressed. The thing is, personally it bothers me and disgusts me. The idea of someone using a sex doll that looks like a child and watching animated porn of people having sex with children Is repulsive (and personally triggering to me). However, we have to remember that we have a goal in mind here and that goal is: fewer children molested and harmed. So if something that bothers and disgusts us but doesn’t hurt any children will make it so that less actual children are harmed, I’m all for it. So in terms of whether or not they should be illegal I am leaning towards no. They should be allowed and we should do more scientific studies to make sure they actually do what we hope they do: make pedophiles less likely to offend. I would probably be in favor of them being prescribed by a psychiatrist or something like that, who would monitor the person using them and make sure they weren’t going to hurt a real child. However, this is outside of my wheelhouse. Do they encourage and normalize a cultural climate that condones child molestation and pedophila? Why or why not? It would in no way create something that condones child molestation. There is no slippery slope here. This has been brought up in countless other industries. Do movies and games that show violence condone real violence? All evidence points to no. In fact, healthy humans are able to separate fantasy from reality and that’s why we are able to enjoy fantastical things that we would never condone in reality. There is strong evidence to suggest that having these fantasies prevents people from doing immoral things in real life. This is why rape fantasies are okay, but real rape isn’t. It goes on and on. As far as normalizing and condoning pedophilia, we need to normalize it in that we need to recognize that pedophilia or people who are pedophiles are normal and that they exist. We need to normalize their sexuality and help them not act on it. This is very important. Normalizing sexual abuse of children is not something we should ever do (and again, no evidence to suggest that child sex dolls do that). Normalizing pedophiles acknowledging their attractions and getting help to prevent them from hurting children is something we need to do. Summary: As someone who has been sexually abused as a child, I am willing to support anything that prevents another child from being sexually abused. If that means sanctioning and providing child s
(47 People Likes) What is the real story of the Annabelle doll?
nt named Donna received the doll from her mother as a birthday gift who, in turn, had found her at a thrift store. Donna kept the doll with her in her apartment, where she lived with her colleague, Angie. Daemonologist Lorraine Warren holding Annabelle Doll. Soon the girls started experiencing strange happenings in their apartment. They would find things misplaced. They also noticed that the doll was changing position. This became more and more obvious. They would lock Annabelle up in one room before leaving and then return to find her in another room. They also found some strange writings on their apartment walls. The girl duo contacted a medium for help. The medium, after reading the doll, said the doll was being manipulated by the spirit of a little girl named Annabelle Higgins. Annabelle, who was said to have died under mysterious circumstances, said that her spirit found comfort in Donna and Angie’s company. She even requested them to let her spirit enter the doll so that she can live with them forever. The girls relented and allowed the spirit into the doll. Things took a drastic turn after that. The girls would have recurring nightmares where they saw the doll attacking them in some way or other. One day when their male friend Lou came to spend a night at their apartment he was attacked by her when he was Realistic Sex Doll alone. The terrified trio turned to their local church for help. The priest there referred them to the Warrens, Ed and Lorraine, daemonologists. The Warrens, after reading Annabelle, said that the doll was being possessed not by a little girl’s spirit but by a daemon and that the daemon had been trying to enter one of the girls’ body. An exorcism was performed on the doll and their apartment with the help of the church and the doll now sits in a glass box at the Warrens' Occult Museum in Monroe, Connecticut. For
(12 People Likes) Can I bring my silicon doll (naughty purpose) through checked baggage?
but do the most damage. Think about this. If the arms that move bags from one belt to another to get them where they belong. The arms that move the bags has to move a 70 lb bag from one baggage belt to anot Sex Doll er. You can imagine hard hard exotic and erotic love doll hat arm hits and moves a 20 pound bag. There can be a lot of damage done. People buy cheap bags. Another problem. Good bags are very expensive but are worth it in the long run. Also bags are suppose to protect the
(66 People Likes) Whenever I look at the real Annabelle doll I feel overwhelming discomfort, and it remains for awhile after. Is it possible for evil such as the one attached to Annabelle to send bad energy through photos?
oked the fabric, commented favourably about how warm and soft it was, all the stuff you might expect. They were then told that this jumper belonged to a famous serial killer (I forget which one; it could have been Bundy, or Manson, or any of the dozens of others). They then reported feeling a sense of evil from the garment, and a great reluctance to put it on, which was completely absent when they didn’t have this piece of information. Of course, it’s entirely possible that the sweater in question was never owned by any serial killers and the researchers were lying to them. The effect is much the same either way. There is a notable psychological bias called the “halo effect”, in which people assume good things about someone because of another, entirely unrelated positive quality. People can’t believe, say, a priest could be a bad person. A lesser known bias is the opposite, called the “horns effect” - if someone or something has a negative quality, it is perceived as worse in other, unrelated ways. The Annabelle doll is just a creepy-looking old doll, but it is the central point in a (fictional) story about demon possession. Because it has that negative quality ascribed to it, the horns effect makes you feel it’s evil as a whole. There’s no such thing as “bad energy”, and even if there was, how would a photograph be
