i love lucy dolls list Relevant Information
(54 People Likes) Should robot sex dolls be banned?
re. The sex doll is the size of a real person. The doll that is made after the appearance of a real person to satisfy people's sexual desire. There are male sex dolls and female sex dolls.TPE material makes the appearance of sex dolls very different from real people. Dolls first originated in the Netherlands. Because the Dutch sailor Love Doll had no women on the sea, their sexual needs could not be met, and they were very bored during the sailing process, so they used some rags to imitate real women. This is the early stage and relatively simple doll. Later, with the continuous expansion of people's needs, the doll market has become larger and larger. Especially in Japan, the production of dolls has gradually become industrialized. More and more d
(68 People Likes) What do you think of real life baby dolls (product)?
own. She regularly sat on the sofa whilst I fed baby, with her doll stuck up her jumper! Real baby clothes fitte i love lucy dolls list the doll, and she had a little cot with covers for it as well. The novelty wore off as my daughter grew older, and the baby sister provided more fun than the doll. I think she
(23 People Likes) What kind of blow-up doll would you want to help you survive a zombie apocalypse?
y from walking undead? sounds crazy but hey you know that would be really cool if that possible…think possibly blow up doll could take rounds? or be able to moved from place to place it seem insane to travel but then again point it can used to carry liquid, food and lot others if you didn’t hav i love lucy dolls list backpack. Hairy guy that seem rude but you can probably paint him however you want…if you get my idea…cameo paint, his ass got be real big…clay, cement, and colors of urban and forest colors to come to mind make you blend in without b
(37 People Likes) Are sex dolls that look like children illegal? Could they be used to control pedophiles’ desires in a safe way?
’m going to establish some facts and personal background before actually answering it. I am a victim of childhood abuse, both by confirmed pedophiles and abusers who abuse children. I’ve written about this extensively and some of the writing is in my profile. I am not a pedophile or anyone who has or would ever sexually abuse children. Pedophilia, or a sexual attraction to prepubescent children, is something that some people are, although estimates of exact percentages vary. It isn’t something someone chooses to be, it can’t be conditioned into them or out of them. It’s very likely, given what we know, that some people are simply born pedophiles and there is nothing to be done about that. Most sexual abuse of children is not perpetrated by pedophiles, but garden variety abusers who target children because children are easy victims. Now that we have that out of the way, let’s look at the goals here. The problem with our society presently when it comes to pedophiles is that we simply demonize anyone who is a pedophile. They make a great punching bag because anyone who is attracted to children is obviously a bad person, right? The fact that they can’t help their attraction is completely ignored and we lump people who are pedophiles but don’t actually act on it in any way (including in viewing child pornography) in with those that do. Because of that stigma around pedophiles, there isn’t a lot of solid research on it and what research there is heavily depends on offending pedophiles as subjects. Pedophiles who don’t offend rarely take part in studies because of the stigma around being a pedophile, so we have a limited sample size. As a society when it comes to dealing with pedophiles, the goal is and should be simply the reduction of harm to children. In other words, the goal should be whatever it takes so that less children are abused. If you look at it from that perspective, the answer when it comes to sex dolls that look like prepubescent children, is that if in the end it reduces harm to actual children, we should allow them. As for whether or not they actually reduce harm to children, we simply don’t have enough data to say one way or the other. Evidence seems to suggest that it does make a pedophile less likely to offend if they have access to some kind of way to relieve themselves sexually like with a doll. There isn’t any evidence to suggest any kind of escalation of activity like using a doll would make someone more likely to abuse children. Similar to how massive amounts of evidence shows that people who play violent video games are actually less likely to be violent in real life and as porn use goes up people are less likely to commit sexual assault, we can extrapolate that people are less likely to act on their urges with a real child if they have some kind of ethical outlet. The main way the pedophiles who do offend actually end up offending is by viewing and collecting child pornography. This hurts children and is wrong as well because you need to abuse real children to produce it. So having an outlet that doesn’t abuse children would make all of those pedophiles that fall into the trap of child pornography less likely to actually do that. This leads us to the logical conclusion as well, where if we could create child pornography without hurting children, would that be allowed as well? As animation gets better, this might someday be possible. These are thorny ethical issues that must be addressed. The thing is, personally it bothers me and disgusts me. The idea of someone using a sex doll that looks like a child and watching animated porn of people having sex with children Is repulsive (and personally triggering to me). However, we have to remember that we have a goal in mind here and that goal is: fewer children molested and harmed. So if something that bothers and disgusts us but doesn’t hurt any children will make it so that less actual children are harmed, I’m all for it. So in terms of whether or not they should be illegal I am leaning towards no. They should be allowed and we should do more scientific studies to make sure they actually do what we hope they do: make pedophiles less likely to offend. I would probably be in favor of them being prescribed by a psychiatrist or something like that, who would monitor the person using them and make sure they weren’t going to hurt a real child. However, this is outside of my wheelhouse. Do they encourage and normalize a cultural climate that condones child molestation and pedophila? Why or why not? It would in no way create something that condones child molestation. There is no slippery slope here. This has been brought up in countless other industries. Do movies and games that show violence condone real violence? All evidence points to no. In fact, healthy humans are able to separate fantasy from reality and that’s why we are able to enjoy fantastical things that we would never condone in reality. There is strong evidence to suggest that having these fantasies prevents people from doing immoral things in real life. This is why rape fantasies are okay, but real rape isn’t. It goes on and on. As far as normalizing and condoning pedophilia, we need to normalize it in that we need to recognize that pedophilia or people who are pedophiles are normal and that they exist. We need to normalize their sexuality and help them not act on it. This is very important. Normalizing sexual abuse of children is not something we should ever do (and again, no evidence to suggest that child sex dolls do that). Normalizing pedophiles acknowledging their attractions and getting help to prevent them from hurting children is something we need to do. Summary: As someone who has been sexually abused as a child, I am willing to support anything that prevents another child from being sexually abused. If that means sanctioning and providing child s
(51 People Likes) How can you tell if a Bratz doll is real?
er and some lost interest. Second, the Bratz dolls came under heavy fire from parents, rights groups, and others for their heavy makeup, oversized pouty lips and heads on small bodies, and (to some) somewhat scantily clad outfits (Bratz was one of the first major fashion dolls to have oversized heads, not counting Blythe in Japan). They claimed they were “hyper-sexualized” and felt they should not be targeted to young children. Because of this, MGA tried to tone down the Bratz, but as a Silicone Sex Doll esult, they lost some of their collector fan base. MGA tried several times and in different ways to revive Bratz…taller bodies, softer makeup, more modest clothing, accessories just for little girls, etc. These didn’t work out very well, and caused the death of the line. The latest revival in 2015, where the dolls featured larger heads than before (and larger feet/shoes), a differe
