jennifer love hewitt baby doll Relevant Information
(82 People Likes) What would be the best AI robotic sex doll for sale today?
/br> Today I want to present a moral question,but some of this post may be perceived as crass. I assure you,however,that it contributes to the moral quandary,and is not merely intended to shock or disgust. If however you are looking for a straight-forward answer to this question,scroll down to the last section. Sextoy What do you think of a sextoy laying around the house,in public view? It’s probably not ideal,but it’s not wholly inappropriate—particularly when “in public view” only denotes potential accessibility/viewability as realistically there is no one coming over. If you are a recluse,you might as well have all the walls of the living room adorned with the most shocking or aesthetically pleasing sextoys in the world. What if it’s a single sextoy,in proximity to children? There are no labels warning not to keep sextoys around children. If any threat is to be perceived at all,it is merely a moral threat,as the sextoy poses no real danger to the child. If the child is young enough,it wouldn’t even know what they are looking at,and they may not even notice the sextoy in plain sight. What if the child is older—old enough to understand what a sextoy is for? Here we begin to enter inappropriate theory. And what if the toy is of a larger size? Does that have any bearing on how inappropriate it is? And what if the sextoy is dad’s? Gender shouldn’t have any bearing on the appropriateness—or lack thereof—of the situation,but somehow it does. Mom’s sextoys are taken to be part of womanhood,while dad’s sextoys are taken to mean a myriad of less favorable things—in part depending on what kind of sextoy we are speaking of. But let’s not delve into a discussion about sex differences and gender identity. The underlying question here is,should a sextoy be confined to the bedroom? Or let’s imbue some judgment for effect,and rephrase it like,“A sextoy should be confined to the bedroom,don’t you think?” We will get back to that later. Human-like sextoy We now live in a time where sextoys are produced that take on the form of humans—so-called ‘Real Dolls’. First I wonder,is there a difference in inappropriateness in finding dad’s Real Doll compared to mom’s dildo? Or what about dad’s Real Doll compared to dad’s buttplug? Is it of any consideration what the sextoy is for,and/or what is done with/to it when it comes to evaluating the level of inappropriateness? Or is the size of the sextoy of consideration? Or the money spent on it? Or the time spent with it? I think all of these questions have a bearing on how inappropriate such a sextoy in public view and proximity to children is. But hold on to these questions for now. Dad’s human-like sextoy Finding dad’s Real Doll in the living room will certainly bring up questions the first time around. Whether dad had sex with it last night will likely influence how inappropriate its presence in the living room is,too. Is the presence of an unused Real Doll more inappropriate than the presence of an unused Fleshlight? What about used ones? Hold on to these thoughts. Sextoy with AI Now not only are we producing life-like sextoys in the form of Real Dolls,but they are becoming equipped with AI to increase how human-like they are. This will likely lead to even more moral considerations. In fact this is where things become interesting. Some of these Real Dolls with AI are now presented as more than merely a sextoy. And indeed,to the owners they often were more than just a sextoy—even without AI. They are often perceived as romantic partners of sorts. See for example the movie Lars and the Real Girl . This is often perceived as pathetic,but I think there is beauty in it too; flesh or synthetics,why is one partner necessarily less,or more indicative of the failings of her/his partner/owner? I’m hesitant to say owner because there is ambiguity in whether the Real Doll ought to be perceived as a puppet or a partner,though most would likely insist on the former at this point. But the introduction and technological advances of AI will cause a transition from puppet to partner—from sextoy to being. Part of the family Even without AI,Real Dolls were presented to be more than mere sextoys,but now that they are being equipped with AI,they are starting to become part of the household. Some Real Dolls with AI are said to have a “family setting”,and that they “do well with the kids”. As a result people have shown confusion,disgust,and concern. Is it okay for dad’s sextoy to “cosy up with the kids”? And what if dad’s sperm from last night is still inside the doll? I know it’s vulgar,but hold on to that thought as well. A sextoy should be confined to the bedroom,don’t you think? Dilemma The last paragraph amused me,because we just saw the same judgmental question return—more pressing than before—and yet we are about to enter a dilemma which may render the question nonsensical,or lacking in specificity. But it’s hard to avoid the moral dilemma we are about to face. Before we get there though,let me repeat a few questions I asked before,and add one more. Is the size of the sextoy of consideration when it comes to evaluating (in)appropriateness? Or the money spent on it? Or the time spent with it? Or the intelligence it possesses? Suppose technology of AI is so advanced that “Real Dolls” are effectively rendered beings in every sense of the word—if not human. And in any case,outwardly and behaviorally they would be indistinguishable from real human beings. Is this Real Doll still a sextoy,or a genuine partner? Is it inappropriate to let her “cosy up with the kids”? Where then,in between the Real Dolls without AI or rudimentary AI and beings indistinguishable from humans,does it cease to be inappropriate to “leave it out”,or to refer to the Live Doll as “it”? At what point on this transition is a sextoy no longer a sextoy,and instead a true being? Funny to imagine though—a sextoy evolving into a being. I guess either way—whether natural or technological—sex is involved. Partner Is it of any consideration what you do with/to your partner when it comes to evaluating the level of inappropriateness of that partner? Is their size of consideration? Or the money you spent on/with your partner? Or the time spent with your partner? I don’t think any of these questions have a bearing on how inappropriate your partner is in public view and proximity to children. At what point are the questions I asked you to hold on to rendered invalid? Reverse I wonder at what level of intelligence and functioning it would be appropriate for a Real Doll with AI to leave the bedroom—to no longer be rendered a sextoy. The reverse of course is very crass—to consider at what level of intelligence and functioning a mother and partner (not AI) shouldn't be leaving the bedroom. The philosophical and moral considerations of these situation juxtaposed amuses me though. The answer To answer the question—well,I don’t think there is a definite answer to the question. It will be a smooth transition from sextoy to partner,and at least initially there will be disagreement on whether this AI constitutes a mere sextoy specifically designed for a person’s pleasure,or a genuine partner,who brings pleasure and happiness into someone’s life just like any natural human would. During these advancements in AI,I would think that increasingly they will be seen as true entities,but it will probably not be a discrete moment when this happens—when Real Dolls cease to be sextoys and are wholle accepted as—or become—true Beings. Not unless there is some kind of revolution of identity which radically changes public perceptions of these notions. But just maybe a revolution of sorts will occur at the moment AIs are perceived to exhibit genuine empathy,pain,sorrow,and whatever “human” attribute we come to identify ourselves with,and/or shake our moral foundation to a degree that “machines” will be included in our moral and ethical considerations. There likely will become a distinction—possibly also in terms of class—between natural humans and synthetic humans,but at some point of sophistication of AI we are likely going to be urged to at least acknowledge
(48 People Likes) What's a reborn doll? I’ve never seen one in real life,but why is there such demand for them? Why do people enjoy them?
oll is basically a doll that has been designed to look as close to an actual baby as possible. If you honestly go look at a toy catalogue and look at the dolls sold by,like toys r us,you'll agree they don't look much like the real thing. This is a Reborn doll This is the sort of doll you'll find in a regular toy st
(76 People Likes) What is the meaning of the sex doll?
s one of sex toys,for people,sex doll not just sex toy,always the sex doll is their lover,jennifer love hewitt baby doll oulma
(34 People Likes) What is the point in increasing the minimum wage if inflation will just follow?
s. Micro looks at the economics of a single transaction,whereas macro looks at the impact of policy on a particular population. The result of all of this is people make some really good arguments… they’re just wrong about the conclusion. James Kwak had a great term for this in a piece he wrote for the Atlantic:[1] “Economism” or “Economism: the misleading application of basic lessons from Economics 101 to real-world problems,creating the illusion of consensus and reducing a complex topic to a simple,open-and-shut case.“ I love the definition. The article is good and I’d suggest following the footnote for those who want a better summary than mine. I’m gonna post a couple of hyperlinks here,to give some additional context. A couple of points. Raising Anime Sex Doll the minimum wage is inflationary . You’re giving more income to the segment of the population that has the highest income velocity of any segment. They’re gonna spend it But the inflationary impact is small relative to the wage gains of those that are impacted. They have more money - and that helps . We’ve been subsidizing the 1% since 1980 and witnessed income inequality hit its highest point in 100 years - and the main cause is the weakening of labor. In the immediate term,the minimum wage is a wealth transfer from capital owners to labor. (e.g. wealthy interests to poorer interests) All of the anti minimum wage arguments boil down this. And this fact has been used to mislead voters about minimum wage legislation. Because there are all kinds of flawed conclusions (like this link) that arise from it (I’ve attached a couple of links to GOP quotes. (Cruz / Rubio / Paul / Bush ) are fundamentally false but try to couch their greed as their immense concern for the poor. Trump doesn’t sound as dogmatic. But,his policy is much worse . I’m delighted by their concern - but,cognizant of the fact that they’re purposely misleading their constituents. But,the evidence is clear and conclusive. There is no evidence of increased unemployment or a reduction in GDP . In fact,there is some evidence of the opposite. There is a LOT of research on this topic. But,the best one was done in 1994 by Card and Kruge r. It’s the one they taught us when I first went to grad school. It’s been confirmed by over 100 follow on studies and the closest thing to “pr
(49 People Likes) Does rowing on a rowing machine feel anything like rowing on water?
wer phase of the stroke: the smooth transition of power generation along the muscle-chain from legs to hips to lower back to shoulders. Because it does this job well it is excellent exercise and prepares you for the physical aspects of rowing on water. Where the rowing machine falls down is at the finish of the stroke. An oar properly locked in the water and loaded up during the power phase will lose its grip at the finish; the blade rotates in the water and flow past the tip begins. Additionally,the blade must be allowed to unload before the finish. This is called the release. The rowing machine does a poor job of simulating this part of the stroke. Indeed,you'll often see experienced rowers drawing the handle almost all the way to their chin — something they would never attempt on the water. On the machine,this tactic gets you a better score. You can maintain power output for longer. The usual downside to this (keeping all your weight static in the bow of the boat while you do a useless sit-up) doesn't apply,because you aren't floating. Putting the machine on elasticated sliders can somewhat mitigate this issue,albeit not completely. The best practice for rowing will always be real sessions on the water. Nevertheless,rowing m
