making a voodoo doll for love Relevant Information
(71 People Likes) How were albino slaves treated in the USA?
t “slavery” was a concept with shifting meaning by time and place in the US and future US. In early coastal areas there were more shifting concepts than later after the cotton gin, with indentured servants treated essentially as slaves for the duration of their contract, black people buying and granted their freedom moving about as free people of color, enslaved Indians, black people owning slaves, societies like New Orleans with more fluid movement (Andrew Jackson’s army there had a considerable number of black and mixed race soldiers). Over time the concept of “blood” became more entrenched. As opposition to sl making a voodoo doll for love very and abolition attitude increased the attitudes of slave-holde
(42 People Likes) What Does a Sex Doll Feel Like?
comparison to uncomplicated relationships with dolls. Moreover, they can be programmed multiple times to be different persons. Advances in robotics may in the future allow the manufacturers to produce replicas so realistic to be mistaken for humans. That is still a few years away. One of the first AI Doll companies offers customized dolls with skin, hair and personality of your choice. The company is perfecting the head movements of its sex doll with blinking eyes, ability to smile, realistic vagina and convincing artificial intelligence speech that allow their sex robots to appear as thinking, sentient beings that can even gyrate h
(62 People Likes) Why do many Libertarians dislike fiat currency?
on.)
Let me share my biggest objections.
1. Theft of Labor (a.k.a. Inflation)
Imagine that your labor is valuable enough that you could trade 100 hours of your labor for a seven day sailing vacation in the Caribbean.
(40 People Likes) Why do people complain about wealthy people just "sitting on their money" when it is in a bank? Don't banks loan a large majority of that money back out, thus putting it back into the economy? Am I wrong about this?
benefit of capital Slowed the recovery after 2008’s housing crisis and, most insidiously Wealthy people sitting on their money causes more wealthy people to sit on their money Let me try and answer the question about the problems created in the US by its wealthy citizens holding their money by first discussing how they increased their holdings in the first place AFTER THE FINANCIAL CRISIS OF 2008, THE FED INJECTED BILLIONS TO STIMULATE ECONOMIC ACTIVITY - THE PROBLEM WAS NO ONE SPENT IT The core problem was, the Fed believed the banks would lend out the money they were given, instead they used the money to strengthen their balance sheets. On the surface, this might seem like a good thing. But, it’s not. The Fed has a tricky job - I’ve heard it compared to driving the Titanic looking in the rear view mirror. The levers they have are very indirect and if they inject too much money, they would create inflation that’s every bit as destructive as a recession Quantitative Easing holds down interest rates - which is great - if you’re borrowing money[1]… The problem was banks weren’t lending. Credit fuels a healthy economy. And, if banks distribute credit equitably - which includes taking increased risks on small businesses, first time homeowners and equipment finance - the benefits of Fed intervention would have been distributed more evenly through the economy IN OTHER WORDS, NOT ONLY HAVE BANKS FAILED TO LEND OUT MONEY, BUT THEIR POLICIES ACTUALLY INCREASE INEQUALITY As a result, the quantitative easing policies accumulated to the wealthy. There are a number of ways it did so. While the attached post deals with the ECB, the same basic mechanisms functioned in the U.S. "QE Benefits Mostly The Wealthy" JPMorgan Admits, And Lists 8 Ways ECB's QE Will Hurt Everyone Else SIMPLY, THE FINANCIAL CRISIS OF 2008 TOOK MONEY FROM THE 99% AND REDISTRIBUTED IT TO THE TOP 1%[2] HOW DOES ALL THIS RELATE TO THE QUESTION OF SPENDING? By in large, much of the recent increase in the wealth of the top 1% is not due to productivity gains, job creation or any contribution to the general welfare. Collectively, they got richer because they rigged the game - otherwise known as “rent seeking” behavior (increasing one’s share of existing wealth without creating new wealth) As a segment of the population, the wealthiest 1% unilaterally appropri Sex Doll ted additional money from the 99%… and they have no intention of giving it back.[3][4] “Financial Policy” (Federal Reserve stimulating the banking system) isn’t sufficient to fight a financial crisi[5]s without inflationary “Public Policy” - which is very effective[6] (Public Policy would have required federal and state governments to engage in a meaningful amount of deficit spending. Unfortunately, conservatives often focus on an imaginary “debt problem” - knowing citizens would conflate the national deficit with a Footnotes [1] Page not found [2] http://eml.berkeley.edu//~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2012.pdf [3] https://files.stlouisfed.org/files/htdocs/publications/review/87/03/Changes_Mar1987.pdf [4] GDP, Prosperity, The Wealth Effect, and Marginal Propensity to Consume [5] 81.5%
(87 People Likes) Do men really mean it when they say they don't like surgically enhanced body parts?
hey like natural breasts compared to fake breasts. When I say I like natural breasts over augmented ones I’m not just talking about appearance. For the most part fake breasts are about money. Either making money as a model or meeting men who have money. This can lead to exploitation and a general feeling of mistrust. It can also be a sign of narcissism. The women that pay for them are usually attractive already and there are better things to spend 5 thousand dollars on than new body parts. They also don’t usually match the shape of naturally occurring breasts so natural breasts are always going to be a little sexier. This tends to transfer to the woman’s appearance and general demeanor as well. Women with fake breasts tend to be actresses, modest and strippers with flashy and sometimes even gaudy lifestyles. According to most studies on attracting this is a turn off for men. We like women who are NOT flashy and who live regular lives. That said it’s really sexy when regular women get them. I was in at a restaurant just after midnight with my ex girlfriend a few years ago. Our waitress was in her 50’s and had breasts which were “pristine” for lack of a better word. We started talking and came to the conclusion that there’s no way they could be real. After a couple glasses of wine we got up the nerve to ask about them. We probably wouldn’t have normally but it was late at night and the restaurant was almost empty. What followed was probably one of the funniest most light-hearted conversations I have ever had. The waitress was retired and got them on a whim one day. She had always wanted larger breasts so it was more or less a bucket-list item. She went into detail about the costs, the healing process, the “design” process, bra-shopping, back-pain, flirting, etc. She even let us both grab them. She was in her 50’s but still really attractive. Her attitude made all the difference in the world and made her incredibly sexy. The verdict on breasts is based more on the woman than on an individual pair
