what does a sex doll feel like Relevant Information
(11 People Likes) Why does my ex boyfriend still want to use me for sex?
ot communication these expectations to the other person due to fear of losing the ex-boyfriend They desire to be validated and that they can still attract a guy but feel ashamed about it because they seem to think sex is a taboo, that there is only one way of living life which is based on the expectations of others and norms and traditions you were taught. You are conflicted. In one hand you want to believe you are special and in the other you want to be desired, and that if someone has sex with you only you seem to think you are not special even though you satisfy your desire and need. Let’s look at the facts… Your ex boyfriend isn’t using you because if he is using you, you are also using him and don’t want to take responsibility of your own action and that you love having sex with him. It seems conditioned in people especially women on being ashamed about sex, and got to have some kind of swing, a barter, a thing, a label, to assume sex is now meant to be something divine because they got a vagina. Sex is not bad. It’s natural. Only you decide with the person who also decides to experience something wonderful together. If you do not want sex, then you can walk away and say no, but instead you by your own choice, go to him, be with him, strip naked, have sex with him and…there is nothing bad about it. You then complain to people here but people here come from all kinds of background, perception, realities, religions, beliefs, and you expect them to tell you what is wrong and what is right. Many see sex as a weapon, many see sex as this divine thing, many see sex as their self worth, many see sex as religious, or taboo or if you have sex before marriage, or relationship or no label relationship, or fuckbuddy, or threesome, they all think they are right and someone else is wrong. Which is absurd. The world is not made for them but for everyone and everyone has different needs, desires and wants. The reason your ex-boyfriend has sex with you is because you desire him, you want sex too and there is nothing bad about that. Maybe you was grown up to believe sex is like business. You don’t have sex until you barter some contract, some business transaction, a transaction of what is called a relationship, so you can be like everyone else, fit in like everyone else and probably even think that’s what makes you special. If you walked into a police station and said “he us using me for sex,” they will assume rape, sexual assualt. That sex is happening without your consent and choice to have sex with someone. That is not true at all. The truth is, you expect something else. The facts is, you have other expectations, wanting to change him, hoping if he keeps having sex, maybe one day you can fix, change him and get the relationship back. I’m talking about a confident man, a man who knows his self worth, a man who does not follow or fear other people’s opinion and probably a man many will troll and have them banned from here. Men who speak reality that does not pamper to left or right, or middle. You have expectations, you want to control the ex to become someone you want him to be and you know, if you do, he will be gone. If you don’t want sex, say so. Communicate to him. If you want a relationship label and all the rest that comes with it, communicate to him. And if he says no, don’t say he used you because he didn’t. You’re an adult, you made a decision to have sex with him, you take responsibility for your decisions and blame no one or complain he used you. If you don’t like having sex with him without having the expectations that’s in your mind, fair enough. Walk away. Say it but please, give up with this talk about your ex used you. It’s old, it’s the same old thing most girls and women say because they expect something else, playing games to fix and change the man to be someone they want. You so addicted to challenge and what’s hard because easy doesn't make you excited and it’s boring. And women also who give you advice needs to stop the double standards talking about how he used her, for convience and always like mainstream media to make women weak and women who are pathetic and are always victims. You’re not a victim. She is not a victim. Nor is the ex boyfriend. You’re a woman who made a decision
(54 People Likes) I want to take my reborn baby dolls outside but I am afraid or scared that people would think that it is a real life baby or that I got pregnant. What can I do?
aid… Without trying to offend - I would be more worried that people will wonder why a grown woman is ‘playing with dollies’ at her age ! I saw a clip on Youtube a few years back, of an american woman being ‘presented’ with one of those things - she literally screamed hysterically ! Watching the clip - My immediate thought was that’s a bit over the top - for being given a doll as a present and, she seriously needs another hob
(11 People Likes) It is of great importance that you wash your dolls
mber that hygiene and longevity should always be balanced in the maintenance of your doll. Additionally, you are suggested to get into a routine with your doll. That way, you can always be certain that clean what does a sex doll feel like ng is performed at
(28 People Likes) What is the most interesting part of the Mueller report?
r (along with all of his lieutenants, in particular Andrew Weissmann) knew even before Mueller’s appointment as Special Counsel that the Steele dossier and every allegation in it was a completely bogus and contrived piece of opposition-research funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC, fabricated by Christopher Steele and Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS. And even though FISA warrants were an integral part of Mueller’s in Love Doll estigations, the report makes no mention of the massive deception of the FISA court by the FBI, by not disclosing that the chief “evidence” used to obtain the warrants, was the aforementioned, totally-unverified dossier. The report likewise omits any mention of the real and extensive collusion that took place between the Obama administration, the Clinton campaign, the DNC and Democrat leaders in Congress, and actual Russian government/intelligence operatives, as it ignores extensive abuses of power by the FBI and intelligence agencies under the Obama administration in the course of that collusion, and the subsequent coup attempt to remove Trump - now the duly-elected president - from office. Mueller went down every blind alley in the pursuit of “Russian collusion”, except where Obama-administration operatives were obviously and shamelessly culpable in that lawlessness and corruption. For example, former FBI director James Comey is mentioned in the report, but there is no mention of how Comey broke the law in leaking to the press as many as four highly-classified memos of private presidential communications, for the express purpose of forcing Mueller’s appointment. Similarly, the report fails to mention that )Trump’s transition team’s) National Security Advisor General Mike Flynn’s meeting with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak was coordinated by Obama administration operatives, using Kislyak as a pawn to allow the FBI to spy on Flynn, seeking to capture him in a contradiction between his subsequent description of the meeting, and what the FBI agents claimed to have recorded. And of course, the report entirely omits the fact that FBI agents who interviewed Flynn following his meeting with Kislyak (one of whom was the removed, demoted and subsequently terminated Peter Strzok), stated that Flynn was not deceptive in his description/discussion of the meeting. The report also omits the fact that Joseph Mifsud, the “Russian” who met with Trump transition team foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos, was in fact Maltese, and more importantly a western rather than a Russian intelligence asset, and that rather than being initially contacted by Papadopoulos, Mifsud was pushed into the Trump campaign for the express purpose of entrapping Papadopoulos. The report fails to mention that Papadopoulos never asked about (nor received) any “dirt” on the Clinton campaign - either during the Mifsud-arranged “meeting”, or subsequent to it - despite Mifsud’s attempts to push the information into Papadopoulos. The report also fails to mention that in his description of a subsequent meeting between Papadopoulos and (Australian diplomat) Alexander Downer, the diplomat not only orchestrated the meeting, but in that meeting confirmed Papadopoulos’ rather than Mueller’s version of events (i.e., that Papadopoulos never accepted the Mifsud offering). And though it spent many pages on the “Trump Tower meeting”, the report omitted the fact the meeting was attended and coordinated by Natalia Veselnitskaya, as a Russian employee of Fusion GPS, who during the meeting never discussed “dirt” on the Clinton campaign. or other information that could be considered “collusive” in nature. The report likewise failed to mention that Veselnitskaya was subsequently indicted on obstruction of justice charges. And while Mueller’s report ostensibly focused on “collusion” between American citizens (in particular, Trump campaign officials) and Russian intelligence operatives, it is totally silent about the fact that Christopher Steele (a foreign national), actively sought out and coordinated with other foreign nationals (many of them Russian) to dig up dirt on Trump, in order to harm his chances of election — with funds provided by the Clinton campaign and DNC. And while the report spent many paragraphs on Carter Page, it omitted the fact that Page was never charged with nor investigated for any crime, yet was used as justification to illegally obtain a FISA warrant to surveil the Trump campaign long after Page had left the campaign (and in future versions of the warrant, to just as illegally surveil the elected Trump administration). The report endlessly omits exculpatory information which expressly clears Trump and other targets of the investigation of virtually all of its bogus allegations, and again never mentions truly damning evidence of the real and extensive Russian collusion orchestrated and committed by Democrats. It doesn't even mention crucially relevant facts such as Deputy/Acting AG Rod Rosenstein having written the letter recommending the firing of FBI Director Jim Comey. Basically, the Mueller “investigation”, like its “Russian Collusion” narrative (at least as it concerned the Trump team) is and was always a hoax, and more importantly a cover-up and conspiracy, to prevent the exposure and investigation of the malfeasance and corruption of deep-state operatives in the Obama administration (Comey, McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, Lynch, Yates, Rosenstein, Strzok, Page, et al - up to and including Obama) in their weaponization and lawless use of investigative and intelligence resources against American citizens and as a coup to derail and remove a duly-elected president, which continues in the latest rendition of the hoax, currently being perpetuated by the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives. Fortunately AG William Barr is now aware of this malfeasance, and in conjunction with the Inspector General will conduct a legitimate investigation to fully understand and expose that lawlessness and corruption, and hopefully ensure that those responsible are brought to justice. Sadly, though totally predictably, the same progressive media that so
(72 People Likes) Accessorize Your Sex Doll
with a love doll and a human, which means that you can engage in vaginal, anal, and oral sex.You should check whether it is the case with your sex doll, but most models have removable cavities, which makes cleaning them much easier. And, to answer your next question: yes, you can cum inside your sex doll. Now, during a love-making session, you might discover that sex with a love doll is relatively dry, which isn’t that surprising, as her vagina won’t self-lubric
